TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Cincinnati Interagency Federal Credit Union vs Mt Zion Woodlawn Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Cincinnati Interagency Federal Credit Union

Cincinnati, Ohio · Under $100 million in assets

92of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Mt Zion Woodlawn Federal Credit Union

Cincinnati, Ohio · Under $100 million in assets

64of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureCincinnati Interagency Federal Credit UnionMt Zion Woodlawn Federal Credit Union
TellerScore92 (stronger)64
Capital cushion100 (stronger)46
Loan quality73100 (stronger)
Earnings98 (stronger)0
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage96100 (stronger)
Peer percentile92nd28th
Total assets$30.8M$142K
Deposits / shares$24.9M$129K
Capital ratio18.24% (stronger)9.59%
Problem loans0.82%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.56%0.00% (stronger)
Return on assets1.96% (stronger)-0.54%
Loans ÷ deposits49.5%6.1% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits2.1%0.0% (stronger)
Offices21
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Cincinnati Interagency Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (92 vs 64). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Cincinnati Interagency Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and Mt Zion Woodlawn Federal Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions