TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Citymark Federal Credit Union vs Back Mountain Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Citymark Federal Credit Union

Plains, Pennsylvania · $100 million – $1 billion

86of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Back Mountain Federal Credit Union

Shavertown, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

61of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureCitymark Federal Credit UnionBack Mountain Federal Credit Union
TellerScore86 (stronger)61
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality71 (stronger)0
Earnings83 (stronger)46
Funding & liquidity8693 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage90 (stronger)76
Peer percentile89th23rd
Total assets$152.2M$6.9M
Deposits / shares$127.5M$5.0M
Capital ratio16.23%27.68% (stronger)
Problem loans0.88% (stronger)6.80%
Net charge-offs0.57%0.47% (stronger)
Return on assets1.57% (stronger)0.64%
Loans ÷ deposits74.7%67.6% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits12.0%0.0% (stronger)
Offices61
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)14.0%—

Citymark Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (86 vs 61). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Citymark Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and Back Mountain Federal Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions