TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Co-Operative Federal Credit Union vs Mid-Hudson Valley Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Co-Operative Federal Credit Union

Woodridge, New York · Under $100 million in assets

72of 100
Strong

Credit union

Mid-Hudson Valley Federal Credit Union

Kingston, New York · $1 billion – $10 billion

69of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureCo-Operative Federal Credit UnionMid-Hudson Valley Federal Credit Union
TellerScore72 (stronger)69
Capital cushion100 (stronger)49
Loan quality6488 (stronger)
Earnings748 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)85
Problem-loan coverage99 (stronger)95
Peer percentile44th54th
Total assets$3.3M$1.7B
Deposits / shares$2.5M$1.5B
Capital ratio23.20% (stronger)9.87%
Problem loans1.08%0.36% (stronger)
Net charge-offs-0.65% (stronger)0.40%
Return on assets-0.33%0.71% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits17.5% (stronger)75.6%
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)8.2%
Offices111
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—36.9%

Co-Operative Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (72 vs 69). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Co-Operative Federal Credit Union leads on 5 and Mid-Hudson Valley Federal Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions