Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Concora Wabash Federal Credit Union vs Afena Federal Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Concora Wabash Federal Credit Union | Afena Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 82 (stronger) | 52 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 62 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 50 |
| Earnings | 36 (stronger) | 1 |
| Funding & liquidity | 63 | 86 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 81 |
| Peer percentile | 70th | 11th |
| Total assets | $1.2M | $97.6M |
| Deposits / shares | $904K | $85.6M |
| Capital ratio | 21.87% (stronger) | 11.16% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 1.49% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.29% (stronger) | 1.14% |
| Return on assets | 0.41% (stronger) | -0.46% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 96.9% | 74.3% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 0.0% (stronger) | 4.7% |
| Offices | 1 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Concora Wabash Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (82 vs 52). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Concora Wabash Federal Credit Union leads on 6 and Afena Federal Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.