Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Concora Wabash Federal Credit Union vs Beacon Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Concora Wabash Federal Credit Union | Beacon Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 82 (stronger) | 76 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 85 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 84 |
| Earnings | 36 | 47 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 63 | 71 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 95 |
| Peer percentile | 70th | 79th |
| Total assets | $1.2M | $1.8B |
| Deposits / shares | $904K | $1.4B |
| Capital ratio | 21.87% (stronger) | 13.52% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.47% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.29% | 0.01% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.41% | 0.68% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 96.9% | 89.1% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Offices | 1 | 23 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Concora Wabash Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (82 vs 76). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Concora Wabash Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and Beacon Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.