Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Concora Wabash Federal Credit Union vs Mt Zion Indianapolis Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Mt Zion Indianapolis Federal Credit Union
Indianapolis, Indiana · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Concora Wabash Federal Credit Union | Mt Zion Indianapolis Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 82 | 98 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 100 | 100 |
| Loan quality | 100 | 100 |
| Earnings | 36 | 89 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 63 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 | 100 |
| Peer percentile | 70th | 98th |
| Total assets | $1.2M | $1.4M |
| Deposits / shares | $904K | $733K |
| Capital ratio | 21.87% | 38.27% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.29% (stronger) | 0.93% |
| Return on assets | 0.41% | 1.73% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 96.9% | 54.3% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Mt Zion Indianapolis Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (98 vs 82). On the 5 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Concora Wabash Federal Credit Union leads on 1 and Mt Zion Indianapolis Federal Credit Union on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.