Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Concora Wabash Federal Credit Union vs Via Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Concora Wabash Federal Credit Union | Via Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 82 (stronger) | 76 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 82 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 79 |
| Earnings | 36 | 55 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 63 | 73 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 93 |
| Peer percentile | 70th | 68th |
| Total assets | $1.2M | $604.4M |
| Deposits / shares | $904K | $517.8M |
| Capital ratio | 21.87% (stronger) | 13.18% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.62% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.29% (stronger) | 0.46% |
| Return on assets | 0.41% | 0.87% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 96.9% | 87.4% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 0.0% (stronger) | 8.4% |
| Offices | 1 | 6 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Concora Wabash Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (82 vs 76). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Concora Wabash Federal Credit Union leads on 5 and Via Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.