Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Conneaut Savings Bank vs Marquette Savings Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Conneaut Savings Bank | Marquette Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 82 (stronger) | 73 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 86 |
| Loan quality | 87 (stronger) | 78 |
| Earnings | 43 (stronger) | 41 |
| Funding & liquidity | 78 (stronger) | 68 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 96 (stronger) | 92 |
| Peer percentile | 70th | 70th |
| Total assets | $76.7M | $1.4B |
| Deposits / shares | $65.3M | $1.1B |
| Capital ratio | 15.09% (stronger) | 13.58% |
| Problem loans | 0.40% (stronger) | 0.66% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.06% |
| Return on assets | 0.58% (stronger) | 0.53% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 82.3% (stronger) | 89.9% |
| Uninsured deposits | 3.5% (stronger) | 17.4% |
| Offices | 1 | 11 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 6.9% |
Conneaut Savings Bank has the higher TellerScore (82 vs 73). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Conneaut Savings Bank leads on 7 and Marquette Savings Bank on 0. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.