Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Cottonport Bank vs Red River Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Cottonport Bank | Red River Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 83 (stronger) | 82 |
| Capital cushion | 89 (stronger) | 75 |
| Loan quality | 67 | 96 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 91 (stronger) | 78 |
| Funding & liquidity | 81 (stronger) | 65 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 90 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 84th | 93rd |
| Total assets | $581.6M | $3.3B |
| Deposits / shares | $500.5M | $2.9B |
| Capital ratio | 13.94% (stronger) | 12.49% |
| Problem loans | 0.99% | 0.11% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.06% | 0.01% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.77% (stronger) | 1.46% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 72.1% (stronger) | 76.9% |
| Uninsured deposits | 21.8% (stronger) | 31.7% |
| Offices | 10 | 28 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 17.4% |
Cottonport Bank has the higher TellerScore (83 vs 82). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Cottonport Bank leads on 5 and Red River Bank on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.
Where both have branches
- Baton Rouge, LA
- Lafayette, LA
- Marksville, LA