TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Coxsackie Correctional Emp. Federal Credit Union vs Hudson Valley Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Coxsackie Correctional Emp. Federal Credit Union

Coxsackie, New York · Under $100 million in assets

53of 100
Below average

Credit union

Hudson Valley Federal Credit Union

Poughkeepsie, New York · $1 billion – $10 billion

65of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureCoxsackie Correctional Emp. Federal Credit UnionHudson Valley Federal Credit Union
TellerScore5365 (stronger)
Capital cushion100 (stronger)56
Loan quality080 (stronger)
Earnings025 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)90
Problem-loan coverage7993 (stronger)
Peer percentile12th41st
Total assets$4.4M$8.1B
Deposits / shares$3.2M$7.2B
Capital ratio28.71% (stronger)10.56%
Problem loans7.69%0.60% (stronger)
Net charge-offs4.57%0.55% (stronger)
Return on assets-0.91%0.14% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits60.0% (stronger)70.1%
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)9.4%
Offices220
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Hudson Valley Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (65 vs 53). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Coxsackie Correctional Emp. Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and Hudson Valley Federal Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions