TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Danfoss Employees Credit Union vs Latvian Credit Union

Credit union

Danfoss Employees Credit Union

Plymouth, Minnesota · Under $100 million in assets

41of 100
Below average

Credit union

Latvian Credit Union

Minneapolis, Minnesota · Under $100 million in assets

62of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureDanfoss Employees Credit UnionLatvian Credit Union
TellerScore4162 (stronger)
Capital cushion96 (stronger)60
Loan quality072 (stronger)
Earnings035 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity6371 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage3088 (stronger)
Peer percentile3rd24th
Total assets$1.9M$5.8M
Deposits / shares$1.5M$5.2M
Capital ratio14.55% (stronger)11.01%
Problem loans8.72%0.85% (stronger)
Net charge-offs1.10%0.38% (stronger)
Return on assets-1.09%0.37% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits97.0%89.1% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)6.4%
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Latvian Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (62 vs 41). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Danfoss Employees Credit Union leads on 2 and Latvian Credit Union on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions