TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Eastman Credit Union vs Greeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union

Credit union

Eastman Credit Union

Kingsport, Tennessee · Over $10 billion

91of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Greeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union

Greeneville, Tennessee · Under $100 million in assets

86of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureEastman Credit UnionGreeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union
TellerScore91 (stronger)86
Capital cushion99100 (stronger)
Loan quality90100 (stronger)
Earnings98 (stronger)68
Funding & liquidity67 (stronger)50
Problem-loan coverage96100 (stronger)
Peer percentile96th80th
Total assets$10.2B$1.8M
Deposits / shares$8.6B$848K
Capital ratio14.87%52.15% (stronger)
Problem loans0.31%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.38%-0.32% (stronger)
Return on assets1.95% (stronger)1.21%
Loans ÷ deposits93.2% (stronger)122.2%
Uninsured deposits12.7%0.0% (stronger)
Offices271
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)26.9%—

Eastman Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (91 vs 86). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Eastman Credit Union leads on 3 and Greeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions