TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Eco Credit Union vs Genuine Parts Credit Union

Credit union

Eco Credit Union

Birmingham, Alabama · $100 million – $1 billion

72of 100
Strong

Credit union

Genuine Parts Credit Union

Norcross, Georgia · Under $100 million in assets

87of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureEco Credit UnionGenuine Parts Credit Union
TellerScore7287 (stronger)
Capital cushion68100 (stronger)
Loan quality71100 (stronger)
Earnings47 (stronger)36
Funding & liquidity100100
Problem-loan coverage92100 (stronger)
Peer percentile57th83rd
Total assets$195.1M$19.5M
Deposits / shares$179.7M$6.2M
Capital ratio11.78%79.20% (stronger)
Problem loans0.86%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.28% (stronger)3.33%
Return on assets0.66% (stronger)0.41%
Loans ÷ deposits55.5%36.9% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits3.7%0.0% (stronger)
Offices73
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)0.0%—

Genuine Parts Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (87 vs 72). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Eco Credit Union leads on 2 and Genuine Parts Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions