Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
EvaBank vs NobleBank & Trust
Metric by metric
| Measure | EvaBank | NobleBank & Trust |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 78 | 81 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 63 |
| Loan quality | 46 | 91 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 89 |
| Funding & liquidity | 50 | 76 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 88 | 97 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 72nd | 80th |
| Total assets | $490.6M | $444.0M |
| Deposits / shares | $340.6M | $396.6M |
| Capital ratio | 27.85% (stronger) | 11.32% |
| Problem loans | 1.61% | 0.26% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.40% | 0.02% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 2.53% (stronger) | 1.74% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 114.1% | 68.4% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 14.2% (stronger) | 29.4% |
| Offices | 6 | 6 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
NobleBank & Trust has the higher TellerScore (81 vs 78). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), EvaBank leads on 3 and NobleBank & Trust on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.