Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
First Nations Bank vs Lisle Savings Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | First Nations Bank | Lisle Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 82 (stronger) | 80 |
| Capital cushion | 91 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 96 (stronger) | 68 |
| Earnings | 65 (stronger) | 54 |
| Funding & liquidity | 50 | 83 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 (stronger) | 96 |
| Peer percentile | 82nd | 77th |
| Total assets | $536.6M | $544.5M |
| Deposits / shares | $440.6M | $383.3M |
| Capital ratio | 14.11% | 26.10% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.12% (stronger) | 0.95% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | -0.00% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.11% (stronger) | 0.84% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 93.5% | 77.3% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 30.5% | 8.4% (stronger) |
| Offices | 3 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
First Nations Bank has the higher TellerScore (82 vs 80). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), First Nations Bank leads on 3 and Lisle Savings Bank on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.