Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
First Security Bank vs Bank of Little Rock
Metric by metric
| Measure | First Security Bank | Bank of Little Rock |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 92 (stronger) | 56 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 36 |
| Loan quality | 95 (stronger) | 83 |
| Earnings | 94 (stronger) | 0 |
| Funding & liquidity | 62 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 (stronger) | 94 |
| Peer percentile | 99th | 13th |
| Total assets | $8.6B | $252.9M |
| Deposits / shares | $6.8B | $231.5M |
| Capital ratio | 15.60% (stronger) | 8.59% |
| Problem loans | 0.14% (stronger) | 0.51% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.47% (stronger) | 6.57% |
| Return on assets | 1.85% (stronger) | -1.25% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 66.1% | 55.5% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 44.3% | 14.9% (stronger) |
| Offices | 77 | 5 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 6.6% | — |
First Security Bank has the higher TellerScore (92 vs 56). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), First Security Bank leads on 5 and Bank of Little Rock on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.