Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
First Security Bank vs Subiaco Federal Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | First Security Bank | Subiaco Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 92 (stronger) | 84 |
| Capital cushion | 100 | 100 |
| Loan quality | 95 (stronger) | 79 |
| Earnings | 94 (stronger) | 46 |
| Funding & liquidity | 62 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 (stronger) | 98 |
| Peer percentile | 99th | 75th |
| Total assets | $8.6B | $27.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $6.8B | $22.6M |
| Capital ratio | 15.60% | 16.12% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.14% (stronger) | 0.62% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.47% | 0.03% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.85% (stronger) | 0.64% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 66.1% | 26.6% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 44.3% | 0.2% (stronger) |
| Offices | 77 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 6.6% | — |
First Security Bank has the higher TellerScore (92 vs 84). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), First Security Bank leads on 3 and Subiaco Federal Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.