TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Fitzsimons Federal Credit Union vs Space Age Credit Union

Credit union

Fitzsimons Federal Credit Union

Aurora, Colorado · $100 million – $1 billion

61of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Space Age Credit Union

Aurora, Colorado · $100 million – $1 billion

39of 100
Low

Metric by metric

MeasureFitzsimons Federal Credit UnionSpace Age Credit Union
TellerScore61 (stronger)39
Capital cushion94 (stronger)31
Loan quality34 (stronger)29
Earnings29 (stronger)24
Funding & liquidity7184 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage78 (stronger)48
Peer percentile24th1st
Total assets$211.4M$167.7M
Deposits / shares$169.6M$151.8M
Capital ratio14.38% (stronger)8.06%
Problem loans1.97% (stronger)2.13%
Net charge-offs1.16%0.56% (stronger)
Return on assets0.22% (stronger)0.11%
Loans ÷ deposits89.7%76.0% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits4.8% (stronger)8.6%
Offices23
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)37.3%0.0%

Fitzsimons Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (61 vs 39). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Fitzsimons Federal Credit Union leads on 5 and Space Age Credit Union on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions