Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Forte Bank vs Fox Valley Savings Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Forte Bank | Fox Valley Savings Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 73 | 79 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 56 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 98 (stronger) | 89 |
| Earnings | 64 (stronger) | 27 |
| Funding & liquidity | 61 | 75 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 (stronger) | 97 |
| Peer percentile | 53rd | 75th |
| Total assets | $404.5M | $387.3M |
| Deposits / shares | $336.3M | $301.3M |
| Capital ratio | 10.56% | 15.44% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.06% (stronger) | 0.33% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.01% (stronger) | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 1.11% (stronger) | 0.17% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 99.1% | 85.6% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 13.5% | 8.3% (stronger) |
| Offices | 4 | 3 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 5.3% | 4.3% |
Fox Valley Savings Bank has the higher TellerScore (79 vs 73). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Forte Bank leads on 3 and Fox Valley Savings Bank on 4. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.