Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Fortuna Bank vs Erebor Bank, N.A.
Metric by metric
| Measure | Fortuna Bank | Erebor Bank, N.A. |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 76 | 78 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 100 | 100 |
| Loan quality | 100 | 100 |
| Earnings | 0 | 0 |
| Funding & liquidity | 76 | 86 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 | 100 |
| Peer percentile | 56th | 86th |
| Total assets | $57.3M | $4.7B |
| Deposits / shares | $38.0M | $4.1B |
| Capital ratio | 34.14% | 38.81% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | -3.90% | -1.03% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 72.3% | 1.9% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 25.3% (stronger) | 27.6% |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Erebor Bank, N.A. has the higher TellerScore (78 vs 76). On the 5 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Fortuna Bank leads on 1 and Erebor Bank, N.A. on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.