TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Glacier Bank vs Minnequa Works Credit Union

Bank

Glacier Bank

Kalispell, Montana · $10 billion – $100 billion

68of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Minnequa Works Credit Union

Pueblo, Colorado · $100 million – $1 billion

71of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureGlacier BankMinnequa Works Credit Union
TellerScore6871 (stronger)
Capital cushion5177 (stronger)
Loan quality86 (stronger)74
Earnings68 (stronger)24
Funding & liquidity54100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage96 (stronger)94
Peer percentile66th54th
Total assets$31.6B$274.0M
Deposits / shares$24.9B$243.9M
Capital ratio10.10%12.66% (stronger)
Problem loans0.42% (stronger)0.79%
Net charge-offs0.08% (stronger)1.01%
Return on assets1.20% (stronger)0.10%
Loans ÷ deposits85.1%47.3% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits34.0%2.0% (stronger)
Offices2364
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)71—
Complaints per $1B deposits2.9—
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)20.0%0.0%

Minnequa Works Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (71 vs 68). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Glacier Bank leads on 3 and Minnequa Works Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions