Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Grant County State Bank vs Concora Wabash Federal Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Grant County State Bank | Concora Wabash Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 61 | 82 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 67 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 22 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 36 |
| Funding & liquidity | 57 | 63 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 70 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 20th | 70th |
| Total assets | $395.7M | $1.2M |
| Deposits / shares | $308.2M | $904K |
| Capital ratio | 11.73% | 21.87% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 2.35% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.02% (stronger) | 0.29% |
| Return on assets | 3.03% (stronger) | 0.41% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 103.6% | 96.9% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 10.9% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 3 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Concora Wabash Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (82 vs 61). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Grant County State Bank leads on 2 and Concora Wabash Federal Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.