Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Great Rivers Bank vs Bank of Kampsville
Metric by metric
| Measure | Great Rivers Bank | Bank of Kampsville |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 81 | 91 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 62 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 96 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 93 (stronger) | 57 |
| Funding & liquidity | 63 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 80th | 96th |
| Total assets | $194.6M | $134.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $167.9M | $110.7M |
| Capital ratio | 11.20% | 17.41% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.11% | 0.01% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.01% |
| Return on assets | 1.83% (stronger) | 0.93% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 95.1% | 42.3% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 16.9% | 7.5% (stronger) |
| Offices | 4 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 27.6% |
Bank of Kampsville has the higher TellerScore (91 vs 81). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Great Rivers Bank leads on 2 and Bank of Kampsville on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.