TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Guardian Savings Bank vs Cincinnati Interagency Federal Credit Union

Bank

Guardian Savings Bank

West Chester, Ohio · $1 billion – $10 billion

83of 100
Strong

Credit union

Cincinnati Interagency Federal Credit Union

Cincinnati, Ohio · Under $100 million in assets

92of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureGuardian Savings BankCincinnati Interagency Federal Credit Union
TellerScore8392 (stronger)
Capital cushion64100 (stronger)
Loan quality93 (stronger)73
Earnings100 (stronger)98
Funding & liquidity72100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage97 (stronger)96
Peer percentile94th92nd
Total assets$1.4B$30.8M
Deposits / shares$1.2B$24.9M
Capital ratio11.39%18.24% (stronger)
Problem loans0.20% (stronger)0.82%
Net charge-offs-0.00% (stronger)0.56%
Return on assets2.00% (stronger)1.96%
Loans ÷ deposits88.1%49.5% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits13.7%2.1% (stronger)
Offices132
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)11.5%—

Cincinnati Interagency Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (92 vs 83). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Guardian Savings Bank leads on 3 and Cincinnati Interagency Federal Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions