Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Guardian Savings Bank vs First Federal Savings Bank of Kentucky
Metric by metric
| Measure | Guardian Savings Bank | First Federal Savings Bank of Kentucky |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 83 (stronger) | 64 |
| Capital cushion | 64 (stronger) | 55 |
| Loan quality | 93 (stronger) | 85 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 48 |
| Funding & liquidity | 72 (stronger) | 50 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 97 (stronger) | 93 |
| Peer percentile | 94th | 26th |
| Total assets | $1.4B | $282.6M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.2B | $207.8M |
| Capital ratio | 11.39% (stronger) | 10.48% |
| Problem loans | 0.20% (stronger) | 0.44% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.00% (stronger) | 0.12% |
| Return on assets | 2.00% (stronger) | 0.70% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 88.1% (stronger) | 119.1% |
| Uninsured deposits | 13.7% | 7.8% (stronger) |
| Offices | 13 | 6 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 11.5% | — |
Guardian Savings Bank has the higher TellerScore (83 vs 64). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Guardian Savings Bank leads on 6 and First Federal Savings Bank of Kentucky on 1. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.