Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Guardian Savings Bank vs Spring Valley Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Guardian Savings Bank | Spring Valley Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 83 | 89 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 64 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 93 (stronger) | 86 |
| Earnings | 100 | 100 |
| Funding & liquidity | 72 (stronger) | 49 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 97 | 98 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 94th | 94th |
| Total assets | $1.4B | $113.6M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.2B | $67.0M |
| Capital ratio | 11.39% | 34.07% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.20% (stronger) | 0.43% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.00% (stronger) | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 2.00% | 2.90% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 88.1% (stronger) | 154.7% |
| Uninsured deposits | 13.7% (stronger) | 16.2% |
| Offices | 13 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 11.5% | 18.9% |
Spring Valley Bank has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 83). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Guardian Savings Bank leads on 4 and Spring Valley Bank on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.