TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Hana Bank USA, National Association vs California Lithuanian Credit Union

Bank

Hana Bank USA, National Association

Fort Lee, New Jersey · $100 million – $1 billion

88of 100
Very strong

Credit union

California Lithuanian Credit Union

Santa Monica, California · $100 million – $1 billion

70of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureHana Bank USA, National AssociationCalifornia Lithuanian Credit Union
TellerScore88 (stronger)70
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality100 (stronger)52
Earnings100 (stronger)43
Funding & liquidity2362 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)88
Peer percentile92nd51st
Total assets$835.2M$175.1M
Deposits / shares$588.2M$143.0M
Capital ratio25.41% (stronger)17.40%
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)1.45%
Net charge-offs-0.05% (stronger)0.00%
Return on assets2.91% (stronger)0.57%
Loans ÷ deposits86.8% (stronger)90.8%
Uninsured deposits69.5%21.1% (stronger)
Offices42
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Hana Bank USA, National Association has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 70). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Hana Bank USA, National Association leads on 6 and California Lithuanian Credit Union on 1. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions