Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Hana Bank USA, National Association vs Latvian Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Latvian Federal Credit Union
Melville, New York · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Hana Bank USA, National Association | Latvian Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 88 | 88 |
| Capital cushion | 100 | 100 |
| Loan quality | 100 | 100 |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 42 |
| Funding & liquidity | 23 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 | 100 |
| Peer percentile | 92nd | 85th |
| Total assets | $835.2M | $1.8M |
| Deposits / shares | $588.2M | $1.4M |
| Capital ratio | 25.41% (stronger) | 25.25% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.05% (stronger) | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 2.91% (stronger) | 0.55% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 86.8% | 20.4% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 69.5% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 4 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Both have the same TellerScore. On the 5 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Hana Bank USA, National Association leads on 3 and Latvian Federal Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.