Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Hanmi Bank vs Hana Bank USA, National Association
Metric by metric
| Measure | Hanmi Bank | Hana Bank USA, National Association |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 73 | 88 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 67 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 95 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 71 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 34 (stronger) | 23 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 70th | 92nd |
| Total assets | $8.0B | $835.2M |
| Deposits / shares | $7.0B | $588.2M |
| Capital ratio | 11.71% | 25.41% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.15% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.12% | -0.05% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.28% | 2.91% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 93.1% | 86.8% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 44.8% (stronger) | 69.5% |
| Offices | 33 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 6.0% | — |
Hana Bank USA, National Association has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 73). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Hanmi Bank leads on 1 and Hana Bank USA, National Association on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.