Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Haverhill Bank vs Lee Bank
Metric by metric
| Measure | Haverhill Bank | Lee Bank |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 77 (stronger) | 64 |
| Capital cushion | 62 (stronger) | 46 |
| Loan quality | 95 (stronger) | 83 |
| Earnings | 81 (stronger) | 60 |
| Funding & liquidity | 55 (stronger) | 54 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 98 (stronger) | 92 |
| Peer percentile | 68th | 26th |
| Total assets | $636.8M | $591.2M |
| Deposits / shares | $507.6M | $519.6M |
| Capital ratio | 11.17% (stronger) | 9.63% |
| Problem loans | 0.14% (stronger) | 0.52% |
| Net charge-offs | -0.00% | -0.01% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 1.53% (stronger) | 0.99% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 91.7% | 84.1% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 27.1% (stronger) | 34.8% |
| Offices | 6 | 5 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 12.3% | 9.1% |
Haverhill Bank has the higher TellerScore (77 vs 64). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Haverhill Bank leads on 5 and Lee Bank on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.