Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Hibbing Cooperative vs Wings Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Hibbing Cooperative | Wings Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 92 (stronger) | 66 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 68 |
| Loan quality | 70 | 79 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 100 (stronger) | 39 |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 (stronger) | 60 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 97 (stronger) | 90 |
| Peer percentile | 97th | 60th |
| Total assets | $108.9M | $19.4B |
| Deposits / shares | $88.3M | $16.0B |
| Capital ratio | 19.08% (stronger) | 11.84% |
| Problem loans | 0.90% | 0.64% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.08% (stronger) | 0.45% |
| Return on assets | 2.07% (stronger) | 0.47% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 37.1% (stronger) | 100.5% |
| Uninsured deposits | 1.6% (stronger) | 8.5% |
| Offices | 1 | 88 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Hibbing Cooperative has the higher TellerScore (92 vs 66). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Hibbing Cooperative leads on 6 and Wings Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.