Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Hingham Institution for Savings vs Alpha Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Hingham Institution for Savings | Alpha Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 64 | 97 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 62 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 74 | 95 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 70 | 99 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 27 | 91 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 87 | 99 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 33rd | 98th |
| Total assets | $4.6B | $35.1M |
| Deposits / shares | $2.6B | $28.2M |
| Capital ratio | 11.19% | 18.78% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.78% | 0.14% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.06% |
| Return on assets | 1.24% | 1.97% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 149.3% | 69.0% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 35.8% | 0.9% (stronger) |
| Offices | 7 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Alpha Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (97 vs 64). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Hingham Institution for Savings leads on 1 and Alpha Credit Union on 6. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.