TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

I B E W 175 Federal Credit Union vs Chattanooga Federal Employees Credit Union

Credit union

I B E W 175 Federal Credit Union

Chattanooga, Tennessee · Under $100 million in assets

69of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Chattanooga Federal Employees Credit Union

Chattanooga, Tennessee · Under $100 million in assets

85of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureI B E W 175 Federal Credit UnionChattanooga Federal Employees Credit Union
TellerScore6985 (stronger)
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality087 (stronger)
Earnings100 (stronger)43
Funding & liquidity7997 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage7097 (stronger)
Peer percentile38th77th
Total assets$13.8M$76.0M
Deposits / shares$11.2M$63.1M
Capital ratio17.82% (stronger)16.86%
Problem loans4.05%0.39% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.14% (stronger)0.36%
Return on assets3.21% (stronger)0.56%
Loans ÷ deposits81.2%63.4% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits3.0% (stronger)4.5%
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—15.6%

Chattanooga Federal Employees Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (85 vs 69). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), I B E W 175 Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and Chattanooga Federal Employees Credit Union on 3. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions