TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union vs U.F.C.W. Local 23 Federal Credit Union

Credit union

I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

98of 100
Very strong

Credit union

U.F.C.W. Local 23 Federal Credit Union

Canonsburg, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

59of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureI.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit UnionU.F.C.W. Local 23 Federal Credit Union
TellerScore98 (stronger)59
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality98 (stronger)0
Earnings91 (stronger)31
Funding & liquidity99100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)80
Peer percentile98th20th
Total assets$15.4M$8.4M
Deposits / shares$13.0M$7.0M
Capital ratio15.39%16.39% (stronger)
Problem loans0.07% (stronger)3.68%
Net charge-offs-0.08% (stronger)0.08%
Return on assets1.78% (stronger)0.29%
Loans ÷ deposits61.6%53.5% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits0.0%0.0%
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (98 vs 59). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and U.F.C.W. Local 23 Federal Credit Union on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions