TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

I.B.E.W. Lu 66 Federal Credit Union vs Met Tran Federal Credit Union

Credit union

I.B.E.W. Lu 66 Federal Credit Union

Pasadena, Texas · Under $100 million in assets

78of 100
Strong

Credit union

Met Tran Federal Credit Union

Houston, Texas · Under $100 million in assets

84of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureI.B.E.W. Lu 66 Federal Credit UnionMet Tran Federal Credit Union
TellerScore7884 (stronger)
Capital cushion8996 (stronger)
Loan quality9296 (stronger)
Earnings45 (stronger)35
Funding & liquidity6793 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage9799 (stronger)
Peer percentile59th75th
Total assets$11.5M$11.2M
Deposits / shares$9.8M$9.4M
Capital ratio13.85%14.58% (stronger)
Problem loans0.23%0.12% (stronger)
Net charge-offs-0.09% (stronger)1.14%
Return on assets0.62% (stronger)0.37%
Loans ÷ deposits93.7%67.1% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits0.9%0.0% (stronger)
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Met Tran Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (84 vs 78). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), I.B.E.W. Lu 66 Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and Met Tran Federal Credit Union on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions