TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Ibew & United Workers Federal Credit Union vs Pacific Cascade Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Ibew & United Workers Federal Credit Union

Portland, Oregon · $100 million – $1 billion

59of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Pacific Cascade Federal Credit Union

Eugene, Oregon · $100 million – $1 billion

65of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureIbew & United Workers Federal Credit UnionPacific Cascade Federal Credit Union
TellerScore5965 (stronger)
Capital cushion64 (stronger)55
Loan quality6082 (stronger)
Earnings22 (stronger)15
Funding & liquidity80100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage8795 (stronger)
Peer percentile19th34th
Total assets$112.7M$139.9M
Deposits / shares$99.8M$123.2M
Capital ratio11.43% (stronger)10.47%
Problem loans1.20%0.54% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.78%0.71% (stronger)
Return on assets0.05% (stronger)-0.14%
Loans ÷ deposits71.6%53.9% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits23.2%3.2% (stronger)
Offices14
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—8.3%

Pacific Cascade Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (65 vs 59). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Ibew & United Workers Federal Credit Union leads on 2 and Pacific Cascade Federal Credit Union on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions