TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Internal Revenue Federal Credit Union vs Onpath Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Internal Revenue Federal Credit Union

New Orleans, Louisiana · Under $100 million in assets

89of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Onpath Federal Credit Union

Metairie, Louisiana · $1 billion – $10 billion

56of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureInternal Revenue Federal Credit UnionOnpath Federal Credit Union
TellerScore89 (stronger)56
Capital cushion91 (stronger)50
Loan quality93 (stronger)55
Earnings67 (stronger)50
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)61
Problem-loan coverage99 (stronger)76
Peer percentile87th15th
Total assets$22.5M$1.5B
Deposits / shares$19.1M$1.2B
Capital ratio14.07% (stronger)10.04%
Problem loans0.22% (stronger)1.35%
Net charge-offs0.27% (stronger)1.15%
Return on assets1.18% (stronger)0.74%
Loans ÷ deposits47.9% (stronger)99.5%
Uninsured deposits0.9% (stronger)9.8%
Offices118
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)—8.8%

Internal Revenue Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (89 vs 56). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Internal Revenue Federal Credit Union leads on 7 and Onpath Federal Credit Union on 0. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions