TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Iron Workers Federal Credit Union vs I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Iron Workers Federal Credit Union

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

44of 100
Below average

Credit union

I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania · Under $100 million in assets

98of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureIron Workers Federal Credit UnionI.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union
TellerScore4498 (stronger)
Capital cushion10100 (stronger)
Loan quality6498 (stronger)
Earnings591 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)99
Problem-loan coverage90100 (stronger)
Peer percentile4th98th
Total assets$5.4M$15.4M
Deposits / shares$5.1M$13.0M
Capital ratio6.04%15.39% (stronger)
Problem loans1.09%0.07% (stronger)
Net charge-offs-0.01%-0.08% (stronger)
Return on assets-0.37%1.78% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits31.2% (stronger)61.6%
Uninsured deposits0.0%0.0%
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (98 vs 44). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Iron Workers Federal Credit Union leads on 1 and I.B.E.W. - Local No. 5 Federal Credit Union on 5. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions