Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
K.U.M.C. Credit Union vs Mazuma Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | K.U.M.C. Credit Union | Mazuma Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 95 (stronger) | 61 |
| Capital cushion | 88 (stronger) | 56 |
| Loan quality | 99 (stronger) | 54 |
| Earnings | 93 (stronger) | 61 |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 (stronger) | 70 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 81 |
| Peer percentile | 96th | 27th |
| Total assets | $31.4M | $1.1B |
| Deposits / shares | $26.9M | $883.9M |
| Capital ratio | 13.81% (stronger) | 10.64% |
| Problem loans | 0.04% (stronger) | 1.38% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.17% (stronger) | 1.04% |
| Return on assets | 1.84% (stronger) | 1.03% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 36.6% (stronger) | 90.2% |
| Uninsured deposits | 11.8% | 3.8% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 10 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | 27.9% |
K.U.M.C. Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (95 vs 61). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), K.U.M.C. Credit Union leads on 6 and Mazuma Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.