TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Kingsport Press Credit Union vs Greeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union

Credit union

Kingsport Press Credit Union

Kingsport, Tennessee · Under $100 million in assets

92of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Greeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union

Greeneville, Tennessee · Under $100 million in assets

86of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureKingsport Press Credit UnionGreeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union
TellerScore92 (stronger)86
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality87100 (stronger)
Earnings85 (stronger)68
Funding & liquidity87 (stronger)50
Problem-loan coverage97100 (stronger)
Peer percentile92nd80th
Total assets$95.6M$1.8M
Deposits / shares$79.5M$848K
Capital ratio16.38%52.15% (stronger)
Problem loans0.40%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.18%-0.32% (stronger)
Return on assets1.63% (stronger)1.21%
Loans ÷ deposits73.7% (stronger)122.2%
Uninsured deposits1.1%0.0% (stronger)
Offices31
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)0.0%—

Kingsport Press Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (92 vs 86). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Kingsport Press Credit Union leads on 3 and Greeneville Works Empls. Sav. Assn. Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions