Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Latvian Federal Credit Union vs Bykota Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Latvian Federal Credit Union
Melville, New York · Under $100 million in assets
Credit union
Bykota Federal Credit Union
Brooklyn, New York · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Latvian Federal Credit Union | Bykota Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 88 (stronger) | 44 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 11 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 0 |
| Earnings | 42 | 100 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 | 100 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 61 |
| Peer percentile | 85th | 4th |
| Total assets | $1.8M | $1.6M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.4M | $1.5M |
| Capital ratio | 25.25% (stronger) | 6.12% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 33.30% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 0.55% | 2.06% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 20.4% | 4.3% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Latvian Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 44). On the 5 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Latvian Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and Bykota Federal Credit Union on 2. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.