Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Latvian Federal Credit Union vs Members Credit Union
Credit union
Latvian Federal Credit Union
Melville, New York · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Latvian Federal Credit Union | Members Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 88 (stronger) | 67 |
| Capital cushion | 100 (stronger) | 71 |
| Loan quality | 100 (stronger) | 74 |
| Earnings | 42 | 42 |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 (stronger) | 63 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 100 (stronger) | 89 |
| Peer percentile | 85th | 34th |
| Total assets | $1.8M | $44.2M |
| Deposits / shares | $1.4M | $38.6M |
| Capital ratio | 25.25% (stronger) | 12.06% |
| Problem loans | 0.00% (stronger) | 0.78% |
| Net charge-offs | 0.00% | -0.09% (stronger) |
| Return on assets | 0.55% | 0.56% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 20.4% (stronger) | 96.8% |
| Uninsured deposits | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Offices | 1 | 2 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Latvian Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 67). On the 6 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Latvian Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and Members Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.