TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Latvian Federal Credit Union vs Metro Realtors Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Latvian Federal Credit Union

Melville, New York · Under $100 million in assets

88of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Metro Realtors Federal Credit Union

Melville, New York · Under $100 million in assets

54of 100
Below average

Metric by metric

MeasureLatvian Federal Credit UnionMetro Realtors Federal Credit Union
TellerScore88 (stronger)54
Capital cushion100 (stronger)46
Loan quality100 (stronger)83
Earnings42 (stronger)0
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)65
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)92
Peer percentile85th13th
Total assets$1.8M$10.6M
Deposits / shares$1.4M$9.5M
Capital ratio25.25% (stronger)9.61%
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)0.50%
Net charge-offs0.00% (stronger)0.86%
Return on assets0.55% (stronger)-3.11%
Loans ÷ deposits20.4% (stronger)83.1%
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)26.3%
Offices11
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Latvian Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 54). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Latvian Federal Credit Union leads on 7 and Metro Realtors Federal Credit Union on 0. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Where both have branches

Compare two institutions