TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Latvian Federal Credit Union vs N Y Team Federal Credit Union

Credit union

Latvian Federal Credit Union

Melville, New York · Under $100 million in assets

88of 100
Very strong

Credit union

N Y Team Federal Credit Union

Ronkonkoma, New York · Under $100 million in assets

55of 100
Moderate

Metric by metric

MeasureLatvian Federal Credit UnionN Y Team Federal Credit Union
TellerScore88 (stronger)55
Capital cushion100 (stronger)21
Loan quality100 (stronger)71
Earnings4249 (stronger)
Funding & liquidity100 (stronger)87
Problem-loan coverage100 (stronger)83
Peer percentile85th15th
Total assets$1.8M$43.5M
Deposits / shares$1.4M$40.5M
Capital ratio25.25% (stronger)7.12%
Problem loans0.00% (stronger)0.87%
Net charge-offs0.00% (stronger)0.77%
Return on assets0.55%0.72% (stronger)
Loans ÷ deposits20.4% (stronger)73.7%
Uninsured deposits0.0% (stronger)1.8%
Offices14
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Latvian Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 55). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Latvian Federal Credit Union leads on 6 and N Y Team Federal Credit Union on 1. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions