Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Lisle Savings Bank vs Aurora Policemen Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Lisle Savings Bank | Aurora Policemen Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 80 | 95 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 100 | 100 |
| Loan quality | 68 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 54 | 75 (stronger) |
| Funding & liquidity | 83 | 100 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 96 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 77th | 96th |
| Total assets | $544.5M | $26.3M |
| Deposits / shares | $383.3M | $22.2M |
| Capital ratio | 26.10% (stronger) | 15.33% |
| Problem loans | 0.95% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | -0.00% (stronger) | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 0.84% | 1.38% (stronger) |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 77.3% | 23.0% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 8.4% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 2 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Aurora Policemen Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (95 vs 80). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Lisle Savings Bank leads on 2 and Aurora Policemen Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.