Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Long Island Alliance Federal Credit Union vs Latvian Federal Credit Union
Credit union
Long Island Alliance Federal Credit Union
Hauppauge, New York · Under $100 million in assets
Credit union
Latvian Federal Credit Union
Melville, New York · Under $100 million in assets
Metric by metric
| Measure | Long Island Alliance Federal Credit Union | Latvian Federal Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 87 | 88 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 91 | 100 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 89 | 100 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 63 (stronger) | 42 |
| Funding & liquidity | 100 | 100 |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 83rd | 85th |
| Total assets | $16.5M | $1.8M |
| Deposits / shares | $14.1M | $1.4M |
| Capital ratio | 14.08% | 25.25% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.32% | 0.00% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | -0.57% (stronger) | 0.00% |
| Return on assets | 1.08% (stronger) | 0.55% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 17.9% (stronger) | 20.4% |
| Uninsured deposits | 4.5% | 0.0% (stronger) |
| Offices | 1 | 1 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | — | — |
Latvian Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 87). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Long Island Alliance Federal Credit Union leads on 3 and Latvian Federal Credit Union on 4. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.