TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Lu 354 I B E W Federal Credit Union vs Hi-Land Credit Union

Credit union

Lu 354 I B E W Federal Credit Union

Salt Lake City, Utah · Under $100 million in assets

64of 100
Moderate

Credit union

Hi-Land Credit Union

Salt Lake City, Utah · Under $100 million in assets

71of 100
Strong

Metric by metric

MeasureLu 354 I B E W Federal Credit UnionHi-Land Credit Union
TellerScore6471 (stronger)
Capital cushion100100
Loan quality899 (stronger)
Earnings65 (stronger)0
Funding & liquidity73 (stronger)41
Problem-loan coverage76100 (stronger)
Peer percentile28th42nd
Total assets$39.8M$37.9M
Deposits / shares$33.2M$27.6M
Capital ratio16.75%26.81% (stronger)
Problem loans2.77%0.03% (stronger)
Net charge-offs0.26% (stronger)0.43%
Return on assets1.12% (stronger)-7.86%
Loans ÷ deposits87.1% (stronger)112.1%
Uninsured deposits12.4% (stronger)23.7%
Offices21
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Hi-Land Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (71 vs 64). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Lu 354 I B E W Federal Credit Union leads on 4 and Hi-Land Credit Union on 3. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions