Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data
Macatawa Bank, National Association vs Tri-Cities Credit Union
Metric by metric
| Measure | Macatawa Bank, National Association | Tri-Cities Credit Union |
|---|---|---|
| TellerScore | 76 | 86 (stronger) |
| Capital cushion | 57 | 89 (stronger) |
| Loan quality | 97 | 98 (stronger) |
| Earnings | 91 (stronger) | 58 |
| Funding & liquidity | 45 | 89 (stronger) |
| Problem-loan coverage | 99 | 100 (stronger) |
| Peer percentile | 80th | 80th |
| Total assets | $3.7B | $51.3M |
| Deposits / shares | $3.1B | $43.7M |
| Capital ratio | 10.74% | 13.92% (stronger) |
| Problem loans | 0.08% | 0.05% (stronger) |
| Net charge-offs | 0.04% (stronger) | 0.13% |
| Return on assets | 1.77% (stronger) | 0.96% |
| Loans ÷ deposits | 91.2% | 71.4% (stronger) |
| Uninsured deposits | 37.3% | 5.5% (stronger) |
| Offices | 25 | 4 |
| CFPB complaints (3 yrs) | — | — |
| Complaints per $1B deposits | — | — |
| Mortgage denial rate (HMDA) | 22.5% | — |
Tri-Cities Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (86 vs 76). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Macatawa Bank, National Association leads on 2 and Tri-Cities Credit Union on 5. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.