TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Marquette Savings Bank vs Port Conneaut Federal Credit Union

Bank

Marquette Savings Bank

Erie, Pennsylvania · $1 billion – $10 billion

73of 100
Strong

Credit union

Port Conneaut Federal Credit Union

Conneaut, Ohio · Under $100 million in assets

52of 100
Below average

Metric by metric

MeasureMarquette Savings BankPort Conneaut Federal Credit Union
TellerScore73 (stronger)52
Capital cushion86 (stronger)79
Loan quality78 (stronger)1
Earnings41 (stronger)25
Funding & liquidity68100 (stronger)
Problem-loan coverage92 (stronger)80
Peer percentile70th11th
Total assets$1.4B$30.7M
Deposits / shares$1.1B$26.2M
Capital ratio13.58% (stronger)12.89%
Problem loans0.66% (stronger)2.98%
Net charge-offs0.06% (stronger)0.24%
Return on assets0.53% (stronger)0.13%
Loans ÷ deposits89.9%51.8% (stronger)
Uninsured deposits17.4%3.5% (stronger)
Offices112
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)6.9%—

Marquette Savings Bank has the higher TellerScore (73 vs 52). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Marquette Savings Bank leads on 5 and Port Conneaut Federal Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions