TellerScore

Side-by-side · Q2 2026 data

Medina County Federal Credit Union vs Latvian Cleveland Credit Union

Credit union

Medina County Federal Credit Union

Wadsworth, Ohio · $100 million – $1 billion

88of 100
Very strong

Credit union

Latvian Cleveland Credit Union

Lakewood, Ohio · Under $100 million in assets

85of 100
Very strong

Metric by metric

MeasureMedina County Federal Credit UnionLatvian Cleveland Credit Union
TellerScore88 (stronger)85
Capital cushion73100 (stronger)
Loan quality97100 (stronger)
Earnings88 (stronger)36
Funding & liquidity93 (stronger)85
Problem-loan coverage99100 (stronger)
Peer percentile92nd77th
Total assets$151.3M$28.1M
Deposits / shares$135.6M$22.3M
Capital ratio12.33%20.31% (stronger)
Problem loans0.09%0.00% (stronger)
Net charge-offs-0.08% (stronger)0.00%
Return on assets1.69% (stronger)0.40%
Loans ÷ deposits67.5% (stronger)74.9%
Uninsured deposits1.3% (stronger)4.0%
Offices31
CFPB complaints (3 yrs)——
Complaints per $1B deposits——
Mortgage denial rate (HMDA)——

Medina County Federal Credit Union has the higher TellerScore (88 vs 85). On the 7 directional measures above (where higher or lower is clearly better), Medina County Federal Credit Union leads on 5 and Latvian Cleveland Credit Union on 2. They differ a lot in size, so ratios such as capital and liquidity are naturally different — the peer percentile shows how each compares with institutions its own size. Deposits are insured up to $250,000 per depositor, per ownership category, at both.

Compare two institutions